The errors in data in (Hwang's) 2005 paper in (journal) Science are not simple mistakes, but it was an intentional fabrication to inflate the number of stem cells from two to 11.

It is the panel's judgment that Professor Hwang's team does not have the scientific data to prove that they (patient-specific stem cells) were made.

It is the panel's judgment that Prof. Hwang's team does not have the scientific data to prove that they (patient-specific stem cells) were made.

It is our priority to figure out whether the data used in the experiments had been falsified or not.

There is sufficient evidence that results were deliberately manipulated, and Professor Hwang accepts this at some level. We don't think that the data in the 2005 Science study was incorrect because of simple mistakes.

This matter is grave enough to shake the very foundations of scientific research.

There is no way but that Professor Hwang has been involved.

This panel couldn't find stem cells that match patients' DNA regarding the 2005 paper, and it believes that Hwang's team didn't secure scientific data to prove that.

There is disagreement among the investigative body on whether Hwang had the technology to begin with.

We commissioned additional tests on more samples of the stem cells featured on the 2004 Science article.